Monday, 2 February 2015

Insult comedies, Sarcastic humor and Consumers...


‘Any publicity is good publicity’  they say. Quite literally! In the past few years, I have noticed Indian consumers enjoying abusive / aggressive shows and have now taken to a new genre which is insult comedy. There is a hint of verbal violence in most youth oriented shows in the recent times. Roadies, to begin with, featured Raghu who could not mouth a sentence sans an explicit. Then came ‘Bigg Boss’ – a show so loud and abrasive where contestants put one another to shame by their histrionics. It is worth noticing that the most crass, foul mouthed contestants and hosts are remembered for the longest time. Let me list down some:
  • Raghu and Rajiv the bald twins who enjoy belittling contestants
  • Infamous Dolly Bindra who shook up the Bigg Boss house with her nasty and loud comments
  • Himesh Reshammiya and Ismail Darbaar’s outrage and walk outs in Sa re ga ma
  • Rakhee Sawant, well, in almost every show that she is a part of. But one cannot forget her squabble with our very own Mika paaji


And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Very recently, groups like the AIB (All India Bakchod) and The Viral Fever that create parodies on topical issues and (consumers all time favorite) the Indian film industry have been in the news for their sarcastic sense of humor and abusive content. However, their comedy sketches have been superhits with the consumers today! What I wonder is how has our otherwise conservative society taken to such offensive and antagonistic shows.
These insult-filled attacks are buttoned up under the garb of entertainment and comedy, but what I find interesting is how these channels and groups manage to feed such derogatory content to their viewers. What amazes me further is the willingness of viewers to enjoy such abusive shows…What do consumers like about these shows? What is it about today’s consumers that makes them revel in such satire? What about explicit comments and belittling people do consumers today find funny?

Over the years, Indian consumers have become much more aware therefore evolved. Improved quality of education, increased exposure as well as opportunities and accessibility through technology have changed the way consumers think. Social networking sites have provided consumers with a platform to express their views with utmost honesty – if you don’t like it state it, if you are feeling hurt write a status, you do not agree with what is happening around you publish a comment - thus making them more tolerant and accepting of sardonic content. Perhaps they are conditioned towards reading or hearing disparaging content. So if a show like AIB knockout or videos by pretentious movie reviews or mockery by The Viral Fever have explicit content, it does not evoke revulsion – it probably is what they are accustomed to. Sarcasm seems to have become the choicest genre of humor.

Let us delve deeper into what has brought consumers to enjoy sarcastic humor…Humor has been a topic of interest for cognitive neuropsychologists. Theories suggest that comprehension of humor lies in the lobes of the brain, frontal lobe being the key area that processes humor. Some neuropsychologists reckon that the frontal lobe as well as the areas around play a pivotal role in comprehending different kinds of humor. Sarcasm activates brain networks engaged in language processing and mentalizing (involves inferior frontal gyrus and prefrontal cortex). Research also suggests that the brain regions (especially the frontal lobes) become more complex and richer as humans evolve. Given the amount of exposure that the current generations possess, the ability of today’s generations to comprehend satire does not come as a surprise. This is perhaps what show makers cash in on. Sarcasm sells big time with the newer generations! Perhaps the new age comedians should thank the complex and ever evolving frontal lobes for this.

Let me be honest at this juncture and express how much I have enjoyed watching these caricatures. Be it the rib tickling burlesques of Arnab Goswami and Kejriwal put up by TVF (The Viral Fever) or the witty yet jocular skit by AIB about Alia Bhatt’s general knowledge. What prompted me to write this article were the other skits by TVF and AIB where actors like Ranveer Singh, Arjun Kapoor, Karan Johar, Parineeti Chopra and Shahrukh Khan have willingly allowed show makers to (for the lack of better words) whip their asses! The AIB knockout event had a turnout of 4000 viewers – an enthused battalion gathered to see two famous celebrities stripped off their dignity. Well, I will not deny that it was funny. I thoroughly enjoyed the do (though I did not watch it Live). But what I wonder is why would consumers today (and when I say consumers it includes me as well) get a thrill out of humiliating someone…and mostly celebrities?!

Gossip is not the essence of this genre of shows. While consumers enjoy watching shows that reveal scandalous, incandescent secrets of the film fraternity, the shows that we are talking about today are much different. They are a lot more intense and demeaning than gossip shows. Some theories that I would like to put forth to explain the success of the shows with abashful content especially towards celebrities:

·         Aspirational versus relatable?

Celebrities are no less than demigods for the cinema loving masses. They are believed to have it all – money, status, power, luxurious lifestyles and multitudes of followers. It is this sort of life that people aspire to live. Most would give an arm to be in the shoes of their favorite celebrities. However, this makes celebrities more aspirational than real; therefore, if I may say so, distant and unrelatable in some ways. Shows like AIB knockout and TVF insult comedy videos highlight the negatives of these celebrities. It conveys to the consumers that these celebrities that they worship are real people who make mistakes, whose lives are not as perfect and who also get spoken to the way normal people do. When consumers see Arjun Kapoor or Ranveer Singh (the youth icons) use abusive language to defend themselves, they connect with them instantaneously – Arre yeh toh apne jaisa hai! Therefore, it won’t be incorrect to say that insult comedies make celebrities more relatable and bridge the farcical gap between their lives and that of the consumers.

·         Subconscious need to inflict pain?

Consumers strive all their lives to earn a decent living. Most celebrities, on the other hand, are believed to be born with a silver spoon in their mouth. Glamour associated with the film industry and being a star overpowers the efforts that go into becoming one and living up to the set standards or expectations. Consumers lead stressful lives owing to the rise in competition. There is constant pressure to convert opportunities into businesses and please clients and the management at the same time. In spite of putting in their heart and soul, most consumers feel underappreciated. This feeling of not achieving as much as one should makes consumers resentful of those who have overachieved (in their opinion). I am not trying to say that celebrities are overachievers but they are definitely more established than our corporate consumers. These consumers are not contemptuous of celebrities but of people who win accolades, who earn much more, who get appreciated for their work and who seem to have more relaxed lifestyle as compared to theirs – in their minds they could be juxtaposing their boss’, classmates or their subordinates with celebrities. Therefore, consumers actually enjoy shows that haul criticism at the successful – perhaps helps them legitimize their own efforts.

·         Sadistic traits?

‘Everyday sadism’ is very common. Every individual has sadistic tendencies. Research suggests that internet has played a large role in sharpening this dark side of our personality. Sadism is said to have a strong association with trolling tendencies and enjoyment of trolls – a very common internet behavior. Therefore, internet in a way is habituating consumers towards unfriendly and insensitive content. Everyday sadists, it is believed, exploit others for personal pleasures – could be de-stressing, just having a hearty laugh, brainless fun. We as people, enjoy watching somebody else being the butt of the joke and who better than celebrities are always under the media scanner, their lives are considered public property by some and they are known to all


The aforementioned theories are not proven and should not be confused as facts. These are just fragments of my mind. Considering all that I have written so far, evolution is the key culprit that has encouraged rise in derisive content. I won’t be surprised if comedy becomes murkier than what it is now. Only time will tell whether this new sphere of entertainment is a virtue or a vice but as of now (in my opinion) there does not seem to be anything wrong with it…

No comments:

Post a Comment